Answer by Assaf S. for Defining a one-to-one relationship in SQL Server
In my opinion, a better solution for not reading the BLOB with the LINQ query would be to create a view on the table that contains all the column except for the BLOB ones.You can then create an EF...
View ArticleAnswer by JohnnyBizzle for Defining a one-to-one relationship in SQL Server
How about this. Link the primary key in the first table to the primary key in the second table.Tab1.ID (PK) <-> Tab2.ID (PK)My problem was I have a 2 stage process with mandatory fields in both....
View ArticleAnswer by DenNukem for Defining a one-to-one relationship in SQL Server
Put 1:1 related items into the same row in the same table. That's where "relation" in "relational database" comes from - related things go into the same row.If you want to reduce size of data traveling...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Answer by Damir Sudarevic for Defining a one-to-one relationship in SQL Server
One-to-one is actually frequently used in super-type/subtype relationship. In the child table, the primary key also serves as the foreign key to the parent table. Here is an example:CREATE TABLE...
View ArticleAnswer by Tamil.SQL for Defining a one-to-one relationship in SQL Server
there is no such thing as an explicit one-to-one relationship.But, by the fact that tbl1.id and tbl2.id are primary keys and tbl2.id is a foreign key referenceing tbl1.id, you have created an implicit...
View ArticleAnswer by Myles for Defining a one-to-one relationship in SQL Server
Why not make the foreign key of each table unique?
View ArticleDefining a one-to-one relationship in SQL Server
I need to define a one-to-one relationship, and can't seem to find the proper way of doing it in SQL Server.Why a one-to-one relationship you ask? I am using WCF as a DAL (Linq) and I have a table...
View Article
